Guidelines for organizing the education system

Doctoral Degree

• * Students must have completed a Master’s degree.
• * Students must have a proven track record, i.e., a career, income, or recognized management or service work, before applying. If they do not have a track record, they must develop a track record for at least one year upon applying.
• * Students with a track record should spend approximately one semester planning how to improve their work upon applying. Students will collect work data, information on changes, and successful changes before being eligible to take the graduation exam.
• * The program or field of study should be tailored to the student’s interests, based on the research topic.
• * University faculty members must monitor student performance and conduct periodic assessments until the project is complete.
• * The research topic should begin with the words “Model of…” (student work or achievements).
• * Our university uses the term “must write a critical paper,” not “research,” because we believe students must have empirical work to extract the critical knowledge. (Criticism is knowing thoroughly, knowing clearly, knowing clearly.) Don’t be a student who doesn’t know anything and then researches to gain knowledge, seeks the truth, and then draws conclusions. Focus on your own work, not on the work of others. Don’t collect data from others, collect questionnaires from others, or gather knowledge from others. Focus on your own work, which is qualitative research.
• * Criticism is Nirodha, and research is the method. PhD students therefore use Nirodha as an examination. What is a successful format?
• * The presentation of a doctoral dissertation topic, which is a synthesis of successful work, consists of three sections:
• * Chapter 1: The Significance of the Topic: Present the background, significance, inspiration, problems encountered, and the topic you wish to analyze. Consider from broad principles to the small points you will present. Discuss the broad principles first.
• * Chapter 2: Analytical Results Similar to a master’s presentation, but with additional information from the master’s degree, present the student’s story, what they did, how they did it, and what the results were (or use Chapter 4 of the bachelor’s thesis). This chapter should be approximately 20 pages long with illustrations. There’s no need to reference theory, academic principles, or the work of others, as the student’s work is considered pioneering, practical, and self-directed. This is self-directed learning, learning from real life (which takes only one semester and then an exam, as it’s considered a lifetime of learning). Explain what merits the student’s work represents.
• * Chapter 3: Summary of Research Results: This answers the research topic. If we title it “Formation of…”, we must answer the question: “Formation of…” of the student’s business success, created independently, without copying or studying anyone else’s work. How many are there? Approximately 5-9 questions. Answer each question and explain each point. Include examples to ensure clarity and avoid a vague presentation. Possible issues, suggestions for the future, or additional considerations may also be included.
• * A doctoral presentation requires an examination. Or listen to the presentation of at least 3 people and the work must be published in a BOU journal or others.